Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 23:59

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
iOS 26 Could Bring Sleep Detection, Camera Controls, and New Gestures to AirPods - MacRumors
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
WWE WrestleMania 42 Announced for Las Vegas After Relocation from New Orleans - Bleacher Report
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Procter & Gamble to cut 7,000 jobs as part of broader restructuring - CNBC
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Asia-Pacific markets trade mixed as investors assess Trump claims of 'done' deal with China - CNBC
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Is there an MBTI personality that is more or less likely to handle stress?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
What parts of the Bible, if any, are inappropriate to read to children? Why?